Rating: Not rated
Tags: History, Lang:en
Summary
Includes pictures
The modern history of Africa was, until very recently,
written on behalf of the indigenous races by the white man, who
had forcefully entered the continent during a particularly
hubristic and dynamic phase of European history. In 1884,
Prince Otto von Bismark, the German chancellor, brought the
plenipotentiaries of all major powers of Europe together, to
deal with Africa's colonization in such a manner as to avoid
provocation of war. This event—known as the Berlin
Conference of 1884-1885—galvanized a phenomenon that came
to be known as the Scramble for Africa. The conference
established two fundamental rules for European seizure of
Africa. The first of these was that no recognition of
annexation would granted without evidence of a practical
occupation, and the second, that a practical occupation would
be deemed unlawful without a formal appeal for protection made
on behalf of a territory by its leader, a plea that must be
committed to paper in the form of a legal treaty. This began a rush, spearheaded mainly by European commercial
interests in the form of Chartered Companies, to penetrate the
African interior and woo its leadership with guns, trinkets and
alcohol, and having thus obtained their marks or seals upon
spurious treaties, begin establishing boundaries of future
European African colonies. The ease with which this was
achieved was due to the fact that, at that point, traditional
African leadership was disunited, and the people had just
staggered back from centuries of concussion inflicted by the
slave trade. Thus, to usurp authority, to intimidate an already
broken society, and to play one leader against the other was a
diplomatic task so childishly simple, the matter was wrapped
up, for the most part, in less than a decade. During World War II, when Roosevelt and Churchill met at
what came to be known as the Atlantic Conference,
Churchill’s pleas for U.S. manpower and aid were
accepted, but only under clear conditions. If the United States
was to come to the aid of Britain, it would be for the purpose
of defeating the Germans and the Japanese and not to support
the insupportable institutions of empire. Britain and, by
extension, France and Portugal, the only remaining major
European shareholders in foreign empire, would have to commit
to decolonization as a basic prerequisite of substantial U.S.
assistance. The French too were a major imperial power with a great deal
to lose from such a monumental change, but their view of the
global chessboard was somewhat different. France lay under
German occupation, and an armistice had been signed on behalf
of the French nation by Marshall Philippe Pétain,
commencing the era of Vichy France. In London, meanwhile, the
firebrand French General Charles de Gaulle urged a continuation
of the resistance, believing the French mainland to be only a
small part of the picture. France was much more than just
France. De Gaulle established the Free French movement in
Britain, based on the loyalty and the ongoing Free French
control of a majority of her overseas territories. The Free
French movement and the Free French army based themselves in
Francophone Africa. The saga of the Free French movement would
impact the war in both North Africa and Europe, but most
specifically, it would serve to radically redefine the French
view of itself and her relationship with her overseas
territories. Most importantly, it would set the tone for a
style of decolonization very different from the British. Colonizing and Decolonizing Africa: The History and Legacy
of European Imperialism across the African Continent examines
the turbulent history of imperialism across Africa and the
consequences it has had. Along with pictures of important
people, places, and events, you will learn about the
colonization and decolonization of Africa like never
before. **
Includes accounts
Includes online resources and a bibliography for further
reading
Includes a table of contents